I will be the first to say this morning's NYT's article that someone with whom she exchanged emails and at one time clerked for Thomas leaked the Justices were in heated argument about whether to take election cases, was highly suspect. The story had zero evidence and was pure conjecture. They could not even quote the lawyer making the claim, although it is all in emails.
But, it seems like both sides are breaking a key rule. You never call a key witness unless you know what their testimony will be, and as a witness you never volunteer for such a high profile hearing.
I believe the ratings will be very high. Gini Thomas believes being married to Associate Justice Thomas gives her and her husband immunity. Her arrogance could cause major damage to Associate Justice Thomas, and the Supreme Court.
No comments:
Post a Comment